Report to:
|
Lead Member for
Transport & Environment
|
Date of
meeting:
|
21 February
2022
|
By:
|
Director of
Communities, Economy and Transport
|
Title:
|
Eastbourne Cycle
Routes consultation outcomes
|
Purpose:
|
To consider the
results of the stakeholder and public consultation about the five
proposed cycle routes in Eastbourne and agree on the approach to
how the cycle routes will be taken forward.
|
RECOMMENDATIONS: The
Lead Member is recommended to:
(1)
Note the results of
the stakeholder and public consultation on the five proposed cycle
routes in Eastbourne;
(2)
Agree that four
cycle routes - Horsey Way Phase 1b, Eastbourne Town Centre to
seafront, Willingdon Drove and Langney Rise
- are taken forward to detailed design and construction as part of
the Capital Programme for Local Transport Improvements;
and
(3)
Agree that one
cycle route - Stone Cross to Royal Parade – will not be
progressed to detailed design and construction as part of the
2022/23 Capital Programme for Local Transport Improvements, but the
County Council will look to identify future funding opportunities
as part of our pipeline of schemes.
1
Background Information
1.1.
The Eastbourne Cycling Strategy, jointly developed by East Sussex
County Council and Eastbourne Borough Council (EBC) in 2012,
alongside the more recent County Council’s Local Cycling and
Walking Infrastructure Plan (LCWIP) and its evidence base,
identifies a borough-wide network of cycle routes.
1.2.
A number of these identified routes have been developed and
delivered using funding from various sources including Local Growth
Fund (LGF) monies secured through the South East Local Enterprise
Partnership (SELEP) as well as the County Council’s capital
programme for local transport improvements and development
contributions.
1.3.
Preliminary designs have been developed for five further routes,
which seek to link up residential areas with existing trip
attractors such as employment, schools, community facilities,
retail and recreation in the Eastbourne area. These are:
·
Horsey Way Phase 1b
– the final phase of the Horsey Cycle Way (Town Centre
– Langney Rise roundabout) from Eastbourne Railway Station
and Ringwood Road
·
Eastbourne Town Centre
to seafront - an on-road route to allow cyclists to travel in
either direction from Eastbourne railway station, via the
Devonshire Quarter to the seafront
·
Willingdon Drove
– a shared footway along Sevenoaks Road between Willingdon
Drove and Kingfisher Drive. Once at Kingfisher Drive the proposed
route transfers to on-road towards Sandpiper Walk and Langney
Shopping Centre
·
Langney Rise –
an off-road shared cycle route which runs along the western side of
Langney Rise from Langney Shopping Centre to the Langney
Roundabout, where it connects with the existing Horsey Way cycle
route. An additional short section of route runs along the eastern
side of Langney Road from the Langney roundabout up to Priory Road
in order to pick up cyclists from Langney Primary School and St
Catherine’s College
·
Stone Cross to Royal
Parade - a largely off-road shared route for cyclists travelling in
either direction from Stone Cross via Shinewater to Langney,
linking to the Langney Rise and Willingdon Drove routes, and then
south from Langney Rise roundabout via Princes Road to Eastbourne
seafront
1.4.
A plan showing the proposed alignments of each of the five routes
referred to in paragraph 1.3 alongside a more detailed description
is at Appendix 1.
1.5.
The five proposed cycle routes will significantly contribute to
supporting the County Council priorities relating to climate
change, economic growth and recovery and health and wellbeing.
2
Supporting Information
Local Transport Note
1/20
2.1
The Department for Transport (DfT)
published its revised guidance on cycle infrastructure design (LTN
1/20) in July 2020, towards the end of the preliminary design
process of the five cycle routes. LTN 1/20 proposes a step-change
in the approach to the planning and development of cycle
infrastructure and this will be a tool that will be used for
developing future cycle infrastructure projects.
2.2
Whilst the proposals do not fully
achieve all of the core design principles set out in LTN1/20,
following publication of the guidance the preliminary designs were
reviewed to ensure that cyclists have the highest level of
provision possible, whilst also considering other road users.
This has included undertaking a retrospective Cycling Level of
Service (CLoS) audit, as advised through the LTN1/20 guidance, to
assess the coherence, directness, safety, comfort and
attractiveness of the design of each route.
Equalities Impact
Assessment
2.3
An Equality Impact Assessment (EqIA) was undertaken for each route
as part of the design process and prior to stakeholder and public
consultation. By carrying out the EqIA’s and seeking feedback
from stakeholder groups, potential impacts have been identified and
all potential actions to advance equality of opportunity, eliminate
discrimination and foster good relationships have been documented.
These impacts include:
·
that
people who are less
mobile, have balance problems or have hearing or visual impairments
may feel more vulnerable/less safe sharing the footway and pathways
with cyclists
·
concerns for the
safety of young children who will be less aware of approaching
cyclists and may stop visiting the footways/footpaths that the
shared facility follows
·
that some older people
are potentially more sensitive to the changes proposed as part of
these five cycle routes because of the impacts on parking,
pedestrian safety and the changes within the footway
space
2.4
Addressing and actioning these impacts with the five routes have
been considered in the design process. These will remain living
documents and will be updated at key stages throughout the life of
each of the schemes.
Stakeholder and Public
Consultation
2.5
Consultation was undertaken with key stakeholders between 16 June
and 6 July 2021 including the emergency services, local cycle
groups, disability groups, walking groups, Local Bus Company
(Stagecoach), County Councillors, the respective Borough/District
Councillors, Westham Parish Council and the local MPs.
2.6
Public consultation on the five proposed routes was undertaken
between 16 August and 24 September 2021. Due to Covid-19
restrictions, the consultation process was undertaken online via
the County Council’s consultation hub. The design proposals
themselves were accompanied by a questionnaire which included open
questions, in order to encourage qualitative feedback. Leaflets
about the consultation were distributed to over 4,500 properties in
the vicinity of the proposed routes. The consultation was also
promoted through the local media, posters, letters/emails to local
councillors.
Consultation
responses
2.7
A copy of the public consultation summary report is provided in
Appendix 2. A total of 188 responses were received equating
to a 4% response rate which is low for a public consultation. A
breakdown of the number of responses and the level of support to
each of the five routes is shown below:
Scheme
Name
|
Responses
received
|
Support
|
Oppose
|
Don’t
Know
|
Eastbourne Town
Centre
|
58
|
62%
|
31%
|
7%
|
Stone
Cross to Royal Parade
|
25
|
68%
|
28%
|
4%
|
Horsey Way Phase
1b
|
60
|
77%
|
23%
|
0%
|
Langney
Rise
|
26
|
62%
|
34%
|
4%
|
Willingdon
Drove
|
19
|
69%
|
26%
|
5%
|
2.8
Respondents were generally positive in their feedback on the five
schemes, with the majority supporting the proposals. As identified
from the survey results above, the proposed Horsey Way Phase 1b
cycle route received the highest level of support, with 77% of
respondents in favour of the proposed scheme. However, the cycle
schemes that received the lowest level of support were the Town
Centre and Langney Rise routes, with 62% of respondents in
agreement for both of them.
2.9
In the comments provided alongside their consultation responses,
some respondents felt that the plans would improve the town for
residents, visitors and businesses, and believed that the
infrastructure improvements would help the County Council achieve
their stated objectives. However, the stakeholder and public
consultation also raised a number of issues about some or all of
the proposed routes. These include:
·
Concerns about the
cycling facilities not being designed in accordance with LTN
1/20
·
The proposals were too small and do not include several major
routes proposed in the LCWIP
·
Concerns about
pedestrian safety
·
Concerns that the
schemes are not warranted because of the lack of cyclists within
the area
·
Concerns were also
raised about the cost of the scheme and how it could be better
spent repairing the existing infrastructure
·
Concern about the road
layout and design due to reduced capacity for motorists, which
could lead to increased traffic
·
Concerns regarding the
removal of a number of parking bays
2.10
A response to each of these key concerns raised by the consultation
is at Appendix 3.
2.11
Through the consultation exercise, several alternative route
proposals were put forward by respondents for each of the cycle
schemes. A detailed review of all the route options had already
been undertaken when each scheme was at feasibility design stage.
Following assessment of these alternative proposed routes, none of
these alternatives would be either viable or preferable given they
would also result in the removal of existing parking, provide
increasingly indirect routes and insufficient width to accommodate
cycle lanes. A copy of the stakeholder and public consultation
report is at Appendix 2.
Prioritisation of funding towards schemes
2.12
From the £4.6m LGF secured towards walking and cycling
improvements in the Eastbourne and South Wealden area,
£2.231m is currently available towards the delivery of these
cycle routes.
2.13
The funding available is not currently sufficient to develop all of
the five proposed routes and therefore an initial deliverability
and affordability assessment based on the current estimated costs
has been undertaken of each scheme. This has identified that four
of the routes – Horsey Way Phase 1b, Town Centre, Willingdon
Drove and Langney Rise – could be delivered from within the
available funding and are recommended to be taken forward to
detailed design and construction. The cost of the Stone Cross
to Royal Parade scheme is outside the envelope of available LGF
funding, and it is therefore recommended that the County Council
will look at alternative funding sources to develop this project
further in the future as part of our pipeline of schemes.
2.14
The outcome of the decision by the Lead Member will be reported
through a Project Change Request to the SELEP Accountability Board
in April 2022 to explain the prioritisation of the schemes taken
forward and benefits to be realised with the remaining LGF funding
available.
3
Conclusion and Reasons for Recommendations
3.1 The results of the public
consultation for the five proposed cycle routes in Eastbourne show
that there is overall support for the implementation of all of the
routes. Whilst there is concern that the proposed schemes submitted
may not fully achieve all of the core design principles set out in
LTN1/20, the designs have been reviewed through a Cycle Level of
Service assessment, and amended accordingly, to ensure that
cyclists have the highest level of provision possible, whilst also
considering other road users and their safety. The Lead Member is
recommended to note the outcomes of the stakeholder and public
consultation on the proposed cycle routes in Eastbourne.
3.2
At present there is £2.231m of LGF available to deliver
further improvements for walking and cycling in the Eastbourne and
South Wealden area which is not sufficient to deliver all five
schemes. Therefore, it is recommended that four of the five routes
- Horsey Cycle Way Phase 1b, Town Centre to seafront, Willingdon
Drove and Langney Rise - are taken forward to detailed design as
part of the 2022/23 Capital Programme for Local Transport
Improvements for delivery across 2022/23 and 2023/24.
3.3
In addition, it is recommended that the County Council explores
future funding opportunities to progress the detailed design and
construction of the Stone Cross to Royal Parade cycle route, in the
future as part of our pipeline of schemes.
Director of Communities, Economy
and Transport
Contact Officer:
Andrew Keer
Tel. No.
07876 878370
Email: Andrew.Keer@eastsussex.gov.uk
Project Manager &
Report Author: James Glover
Tel. No. 0118 946 7257
Email: James.Glover@jacobs.com
LOCAL
MEMBERS
Councillors Di Cara;
Holt; Liddiard; Rodohan; Daniel Shing; Shuttleworth; Tutt;
Taylor
BACKGROUND
DOCUMENTS
None