4.1 The Committee
considered a report by Nigel Manvell
(Deputy Chief Finance Officer Brighton & Hove City Council),
Kevin Foster (Chief Operating Officer East Sussex County Council),
Leigh Whitehouse (Executive Director of Resources Surrey County
Council) which highlighted:
-
The Quarter 1 position, previously reported to the
three partner authorities, which shows a £965k overspend, in
part due to pausing of planned restructures during the
pandemic
-
Past performance in over-delivery of savings, with
2020/21 being year 2 of a three year plan
-
Targeting of support to IT and Agile programmes, to
enable staff to work flexibly during the pandemic, and supporting
suppliers and their payments, and ensuring payroll continues to
operate
-
Some targets had been set at an ambitious level,
based on traded services and process automation, neither of which
have been achievable during the pandemic
-
Surrey and East Sussex have major financial system
replacement programmes under way, which are a large factor in
delivery of future efficiencies and savings
4.2 The Committee asked
questions about:
-
Whether Business Operations savings targets are
achievable
-
Spend on Agency staff, and the patterns across the
authorities
-
Traded services
-
Increased expenditure on staff during the pandemic,
and whether that could be set against Government Covid-19 related
funds
-
Staffing cost figures shown in table 2
4.3 Officers
responded
-
Business Services is developing proposals to meet
its savings target, with stricter control on recruitment and
strategic oversight of vacancies. Further savings may come with
service implications: any options and proposals will be developed
together with the potential impacts, and be presented to the
Committee before any determination by each partner
authority. The new finance systems are
due to come online in 2022/23 and 2023/24.
-
Spending on agency staff is being managed down, with
a reduction on spend to cover vacancies. The remaining area of spend is mainly
project-based to cover increased demand, much of it IT related with niche and specialist
staff. Monthly figures are provided to
the officer team to monitor and challenge the position, and Orbis
is not an outlier.
-
Focus has been on serving the three partner
authorities rather than expanding traded services, with the
re-procurement of the finance systems as a factor, as it is an
intensive process. There would be a
risk of focus on the traded service impacting on delivery of the
change programme. The correct pricing
structure, to ensure the balance of risk, would need to be
assessed. There is also a risk
under-performing and impacting on the quality of the service
provided and exposure to claims. The service is looking to a future
growth agenda with longer term gains rather than short term
activity.
-
The Government’s Covid-19 funding did not
match the expenditure, but the Finance Teams are overseeing that
transactions are coded correctly to ensure that all claims are
accurate.
-
Staffing costs show an impact of the pandemic, with
increased agency spend during the quarter which will not occur in
future quarters. The spend profile
needs analysis and can be affected by vacancy rates, and finance
managers meet regularly with budget holders. Quarter 1 saw unusual
patterns of spend, with staff covering colleagues who were
isolating and savings initiatives being put on pause.
4.4 The Committee
RESOLVED to (1) note the report; and
(2) agree to consider proposals for any future
savings, ahead of them being presented to partner
authorities.