25.1 The report provided the Committee with
an update on progress in relation to an Action Plan developed by
the Department following an Ofsted inspection of Children in Need
of Help and Protection, Children Looked After and Care Leavers (the outcome of
the inspection was published in March 2014). Ofsted judged the services in this area as
‘Good’, with the Adoption Service being judged as
‘Outstanding’.
However, one sub-judgement of ‘Requires Improvement’
was issued in relation to the Care Leavers service. As a result the Department developed an Action
Plan to address Ofsted’s findings for this
service.
25.2 Following introductory remarks from
Stuart Gallimore, Director of Children’s Services,
Liz Rugg, Assistant Director
(Early Help and
Social Care), provided a summary of progress on the Action
Plan. This included confirmation that
the Care Leavers Service is now one team, based in a single office
location and that the Department have
strengthened the proportion of qualified social work staff to
non-qualified social work staff.
This strengthening has helped with planning and risk
assessment. Feedback from care
leavers has also been sought to assist with developing effective
pathway plans which are audited to ensure they are in a suitable
format for young people. Progress
has also been made with regard to the Virtual School and the
assistance it has provided in helping improve outcomes for Care Leavers.
25.3
The area that continues to be a
challenge for the Department relates to accommodation. Whilst there continues to be
some supported accommodation available, such as the YMCA, there is
insufficient provision to meet demand – particularly in the
east of the county. Given the
savings required in the next 3 years, it is the Department’s
view that this situation is likely to deteriorate
further. This may mean further
use of Bed and Breakfast accommodation where no other provision is
possible and the alternative would be street
homelessness.
Comments and Questions
25.4 The Committee thanked the Department for the
update on the Action Plan and debated a number of issues which are
summarized below.
- Apprenticeships. The Committee felt the current performance
regarding take-up of apprenticeships by care leavers was
disappointing. A query was also raised
about whether more could be done to look at alternative sources of
funding and support for this area (so as to help boost the levels
of apprenticeships taken-up by care leavers). In response, Anna Brookes (Head of Virtual School and Education,
Employment and Training Coordinator) explained that whilst the
apprenticeship figures are disappointing, the Department had tried
hard to improve take-up levels. For
example, a number of young people had started apprenticeships, but
not all were successfully completed. The main impediment to successful completion
appearing to be an affordability issue, as young people lose
housing benefits if they accept the offer of an
apprenticeship. In response to a
suggestion that representations should be
made to the Government about the complexity of the benefits system
in relation to young people, the Committee were informed that this
area is being looked at nationally. The Committee were also assured that the
Department were exploring all possible sources of funding and
support for care leavers. Other
issues discussed included reference to the relatively low target
the Department have for care leavers to take-up
apprenticeships. In response the
Committee were informed that the target is linked to Personal
Education Plans, the number of Level 2 courses and the views of the
young people themselves as to what they want to do. In the main 16-18 year olds enrol in Further
Education if they are able to sustain this. Others enrol in re-engagement programmes
such as the Prince’s Trust Programme. One positive development is the growth in
numbers of young people going on to university. The Committee were also informed about
the Countywide Employability Strategy, which care leavers are
considered a key part of. East Sussex
County Council (ESCC) itself has also developed opportunities for
care leavers. The main issue now is to
match these opportunities with what young people want to
do. Progress is also being made with
regard to the services that ESCC commission and to see what can be
done to require external providers to offer opportunities for care
leavers. The Committee were also
assured that this area of work is monitored via the Council’s
Care to Work strategy.
- Accommodation.
Whilst the Committee recognised the complexity of
this area, they expressed particular concern about the provision of
suitable accommodation and the impact on young people of proposed
savings to the Supporting People programme in Adult Services . The
Committee also asked what dialogue was taking place with borough
and district councils regarding accommodation. In response the Director of Children’s
Services agreed that the proposed savings will have an impact, but
that it is the role of the Department to work with a range of
partners to mitigate so far as is possible the scale of this
impact. It was also
confirmed that the Department is discussing with borough and
districts councils the issue of accommodation. This involves, for example, discussions
around the processes followed by borough and districts and whether,
if slight changes were made by them, ESCC might then be in a
position to recoup some monies which could then be fed back into
this area. The Director assured
the Committee that the Department will keep the matter of
accommodation for this vulnerable group under close
review.
- Supported
Lodging Providers. The Committee also asked about the level of
payments being made to supported lodging
providers and whether savings could be made to help fund the
establishment of more providers. In response the Committee were
informed that given the competitive market within which ESCC
operates, there is limited scope for re-negotiating terms with
providers of supported lodgings.
- Independence. The Committee noted the high percentage of
children with special educational needs – 89% or 40 out of
the 45 children who had been in continuous care for the 12 months
ending 31 March 2015 (Indicator CP07 on page 21 of the
agenda). The
Committee were concerned therefore as to whether the Department was
setting itself unrealistic targets regarding independent living for
Care Leavers and identifying appropriate pathways. In response Liz Rugg informed the Committee that
one of the strengths of the Virtual School is that the Department
have developed a good track record of mapping future
pathways. Ultimately each pathway
must come down to the needs of the individual and the reality is
that whilst some of these young people will be able live
independently, others will continue to need some support
indefinitely. A central
task for the Department therefore is to try and reduce the numbers
of those who need support in perpetuity. Anna Brookes also informed the Committee
that an increasing number of young people are being identified with
social, emotional and mental well-being needs. The Department therefore aims to help these young
people achieve emotional and mental well-being and to be
emotionally successful. This
would hopefully then help them stabilize and avoid becoming NEET in
the long term.
- Key
Documents
In response to a question
from the Committee, it was confirmed that the relevant officers
keep copies of key documents (such as passports and national
insurance documents) in case they are misplaced by young
people.
25.5 The Committee decided that they would
like to give further consideration to the issue of accommodation
for care leavers and therefore agreed that the original
Recommendation 2 in the report be
amended with wording set out in paragraph 25.6 (2)
below.
25.6 RESOLVED:- It was resolved
to:
1)
note the progress made in key areas within
services to care leavers;
and
2) ask for more
information regarding the ongoing challenges in providing
sufficient, suitable accommodation options for care leavers; to
consider, as part of the RPPR process, whether the risks identified
in the report to this group could be reduced; and to investigate
whether further progress could be made with Borough and District
councils to help address the accommodation challenges identified in
the report.