Minutes:
43.1
The Committee considered a report
introduced by Russell Wood, Pensions Manager and Andrew Singh,
ISIO.
43.2 The Committee’s discussion included the following key issues:
1)
The Committee are asked to note that the
United Nations Principles for Responsible Investment (PRI) is not
accepting submissions in 2022, so the Fund’s first submission
will be deferred until 2023.
2)
The Quarterly Performance Report for Q2
2022 and Q3 2022 are attached as Appendix 2 and 3. Since the last
reported position, the valuation of the Fund has decreased from
£4.7bn as at 31 March 2022 to £4.50bn as at 30
September 2022 (a decrease of £0.2bn). This is a small
partial recovery from the unreported 30 June 2022 value of
£4.49bn. This performance reflects a negative absolute return
of 4.0% in the quarter to June and a positive absolute return of
0.2% in the quarter to September. The Fund marginally outperformed
the benchmark in both periods.
3)
The fall in gilt values caused significant liquidity
concerns for UK DB pension schemes. Most
growth asset classifications have struggled with the market
volatility. The Bank of England have given a strong statement and
markets have been trying to find the best way to respond.
4)
The report details the increase in gilt yields and
the upwards trend following the interest rate rise. The impact of the governments October 2022 Kwasi
Kharteng mini-budget has largely passed.
5)
The Fund’s assets delivered a positive return
over Q3, performance across the Fund’s mandates was
predominantly positive with equity and infrastructure markets in
particular increasing in value. Fixed
income portfolios performed the least well due to rising interest
rates.
6)
The outlook for the next 3 – 5
years is positive.
7)
Following the Committee’s agreement
at the February 2022 meeting to appoint IFM to mandate, the Fund
has successfully onboarded and estimated time to deployment to be
in the region of 3-9 months.
8) Schroders have had some staff changes, the impact of which will be monitored along with the property portfolio.
9)
It is sensible to review the overall
asset allocation following the market volatility though there
should be consideration given to the timing of implementing
changes.
10) There will be a revised strategy for the Committee
to consider in 2023 in response to the new valuation.
11) Sustainable funds have been affected by limited exposure to the energy sector.
12)Osmosis is not linked
to a traditional market index but have a proprietary sustainable
approach looking at companies who make the most efficient use of
their resources. The returns will lag against the value of fossil
fuel companies.
13) There was a discussion on what the performance of funds were being benchmarked against. The Committee would welcome any further data available in future to further illustrate the progress being made by each fund against its benchmarks.
14)The rebalancing policy is aimed at the liquid assets on a quarterly basis in a range set around the fund’s strategic asset valuation (ISIO give steer on range) and designed to work at a time of volatility.
15)The revised policy includes a proposal to give the CFO discretion to invest 5% of the portfolio outside of strategy in order to take advance of market situations as they occur, in addition to the emergency powers already in place.
43.3 The Committee RESOLVED to
1) Note the investment report
2) Approve the rebalancing policy
Supporting documents: